Dr. Pronab K. Chowdhury describes the relationship between Zionism and antisemitism as a
“positive feedback circuit” (abvZœK wdWe¨vK wewkó eZ©bx), where each force acts to
strengthen the other in a mutually reinforcing cycle 1, 2.
The author’s description of this cycle includes the following key elements:
● Antisemitism as a Driver for Zionism: The author notes that the founder of Zionism,
Theodor Herzl, explicitly described how an increase in antisemitic sentiment (Bûw`
we‡Øl) directly strengthens Jewish nationalism and the Zionist movement 2.
● Zionism as a Provocation for Antisemitism: While Herzl did not explicitly state it,
Chowdhury argues that the inverse is also true: the rise of Zionist activities and “Jewish
supremacist” attitudes provokes a corresponding increase in antisemitic consciousness
among non-Jewish populations 2. He describes these two forces as being bound
together by a single “evolutionary thread” 3.
● Einstein as the “Impulse”: The author asserts that Albert Einstein played a critical role
in this cycle by providing a constant “impulse” (av°v) to the feedback loop between
1923 and 1933 1. Einstein’s public Zionist advocacy and his perceived “tribal hatred” of
ethnic Germans are characterized as actions that intensified the circuit 2.
● Catalyst for Nazism and the Holocaust: Chowdhury justifies this theory by claiming
that Einstein’s Zionist and anti-German rhetoric served as a “catalyst” (cÖfveK) for the
rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party 4, 5. He argues that by intentionally provoking
increased antisemitism through his global celebrity, Einstein (acting as a tool for the
Zionist movement) helped create the very conditions that led to the Holocaust, which in
turn provided the necessary international guilt to establish the State of Israel 5-7.
● Evolutionary Instability: Within the framework of Evolutionary Anthropodynamics,
the author characterizes this feedback loop as a “Sapiens Powered Evolutionary
Explosion” (SPEE) or an “evolutionary bomb” 8, 9. He views the cycle not as a series of
random political events, but as a pathological evolutionary program that reached a
violent breaking point through the “75-year rule” 10-12.
In summary, the author describes a system where Zionist leadership used antisemitism as a tool
to unify a fragmented diaspora, while their own actions (symbolized by Einstein) simultaneously
fueled the very hatred they claimed to oppose, ultimately creating a cycle of global crisis 1, 2, 5.
