Within the framework of Evolutionary Anthropodynamics, Dr. Pronab K. Chowdhury offers a highly critical and unconventional re-evaluation of these three terms, viewing them as
interconnected components of a global power structure based on “IQ supremacy.”
- Palestine (wdwjw¯Íb)
The author views “Palestine” not as an empty land, but as a territory with a continuous history of indigenous habitation.
● Rejection of the “Empty Land” Myth: He challenges the Zionist slogan “a land without people for a people without land,” asserting that farming populations have existed there
for 14,000 years 1, 2.
● Indigenous Identity: The author argues that modern Palestinian Arabs are the actual descendants of ancient Canaanites and are genetically more “semitic” than the
Ashkenazi (HIIHIQ) population, whom he describes as having significant Southern European ancestry 2.
● Political Conflict: He notes that the term is considered “unpleasant” by modern Zionists because it acknowledges a native population whose presence contradicts the goal of a
“Jewish supremacist state” 3, 4. - Einstein (AvBb÷vBb)
Dr. Chowdhury treats “Einstein” less as a historical scientist and more as a manufactured global brand name.
● The “Founding Father” of Empire: Einstein is described as the architect of a borderless, wealth-extracting “IQ supremacy empire,” compared in historical significance to Genghis Khan 5-7.
● Hedonistic Opportunism: The author labels Einstein a “hedonistic opportunistic intelligent professional” who traded his original purpose as a truth-seeker for global celebrity and tribal (Zionist) interests 8-10.
● Diminished Scientific Merit: He claims Einstein’s original contribution to the 1905 “miracle year” papers was no more than 10%, arguing he primarily “poured old wine into
new bottles” by re-editing the work of predecessors 11-13.
● Character Failures: Personally, Einstein is evaluated as a “heartless” father and a “disloyal” friend who abandoned those close to him for personal convenience 14-16. - Holocaust (n‡jvKv÷)
The author defines the Holocaust as a “Sapiens Powered Evolutionary Explosion (SPEE)” or an “evolutionary bomb” 17, 18.
● Pathological Program: He describes it as a pathological evolutionary program driven by historical cultural friction between European and Jewish populations, reaching a
violent breaking point through the “75-year rule” 19, 20.
● Einstein as a Catalyst: In a controversial assessment, the author claims Einstein’s adoption of perceived “Jewish supremacy” attitudes in Berlin acted as a catalyst that
provoked ethnic German scientists and fueled the racial antisemitism leading to the catastrophe 21-23.
● Political Utility: He suggests the “Holocaust” is currently utilized as “Holocaust guilt”—a tool of social engineering used to secure political leverage for the Zionist project and distract from its “wealth-plundering” nature 24, 25.
● Strategic Outcome: Ultimately, he views the Holocaust as the event that created the international guilt and mass displacement necessary to establish the State of Israel at
the expense of native Palestinians 26, 27.
