Within the framework of Evolutionary Anthropodynamics, Dr. Pronab K. Chowdhury justifies
his claim that the statue of Albert Einstein near the National Mall in Washington, D.C., is
undesirable from the perspective of American values by arguing that Einstein’s public record
was fundamentally “anti-American” and that his elevation in such a “sacred place”
undermines domestic achievements 1, 2.
The author provides the following specific justifications:
● Evidence of an “Anti-American Mentality”: Chowdhury cites Einstein’s written works
as proof of his hostility toward core American values, such as capitalism. He points to
Einstein’s 1949 essay “Why Socialism?”, in which Einstein praised socialist systems
and condemned American capitalism as “evil” 1. Furthermore, he mentions Einstein’s
essay “The Negro Question,” where Einstein characterized American white racism as a
“disease” and an “evil” 1. The author argues that a figure who publicly criticized the
nation’s economic and social structures in this manner should not be honored alongside
national heroes 1.
● Inappropriateness of the Location: The author describes the National Mall as a
“sacred place” (cxV ’̄vb) dedicated to the memory of the American founding fathers
and national leaders 1. He argues that it is a “fantasy” or inappropriate to honor a
foreign-born immigrant scientist in this specific location, especially one he perceives
as having an anti-American outlook 1.
● Marginalization of American-Born Talent: Chowdhury asserts that the statue’s
existence implies Einstein’s scientific contributions were unique, which he disputes. He
claims that there were many American-born scientists (both Jewish and non-Jewish)
in the 20th century whose achievements were equal to Einstein’s but who were ignored
in favor of the “Zionist brand name” 2.
● Monument to an “Empire Builder”: Within his scientific framework, the author justifies
his opposition by claiming the statue does not truly represent science, but rather serves
as a tribute to Einstein as the founding father of a “Zionist empire” or an “IQ
supremacy empire” 2, 3. He compares Einstein to Genghis Khan, arguing that the
statue commemorates a leader who used intellectual dominance to establish a
borderless power structure that extracted wealth and influenced American policy for
tribal gain 2-4.
● FBI Investigation as Context: The author highlights that the FBI maintained a
1,400-page file on Einstein due to suspicions of his communist leanings and
“anti-American” activities, which he uses to further justify the idea that Einstein’s
presence in the nation’s “sacred” center is a contradiction of American national interests
1.
In summary, the author portrays the statue as a product of Zionist social engineering that
uses Einstein’s manufactured image to occupy a space meant for genuine American national
icons, while simultaneously celebrating a figure who held American economic and social values
in contempt 1, 2.
